Republican crisis politics


Republican crisis politics

Rather than choose to legislate pragmatically the Republican Crisis Politics strategy is once again front and center in the news as we approach the very real possibility of another government shutdown led by the insistence of the Republican majority (4 members) to demand that any legislation must be what they say about it or they will, like a schoolyard bully, they will take their ball and go home.

In recent weeks, House Speaker Mike Johnson’s approach to leadership raises a critical question: Why do Republicans insist on Crisis Politics rather than working toward pragmatic governance? This approach may appeal to certain segments of their MAGA base. It does, however, come at the expense of effective governance and bipartisan cooperation. In this post, we will delve deeper into the phenomenon of “Republican Crisis Politics” and its implications for our democracy.

Republican Crisis Politics: The Flawed Strategy

House Speaker Johnson’s initial moves as speaker exemplify a strategy that prioritizes brinkmanship over collaboration. By attempting to link funding for Israel with cuts to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Johnson sought to create leverage for negotiations. However, this approach was fiscally unsound It also led to immediate rejection by the Senate and the White House. This move serves as an example of a recurring pattern within the Republican Party. Short-term political wins often take precedence over long-term governance.

Republican Crisis Politics: Historical Weakness in Leadership

The rise of Mike Johnson to the position of Speaker of the House marked by his limited experience puts him in a weakened position. Correspondingly, He demonstrates a lack of political clout in his own caucus. His background in fiscal policy and focus on social issues translates into his being not equipped to navigate the complexities of budget negotiations and foreign policy. At any rate, Johnson’s inexperience highlights a larger problem of leadership within the Republican Party.

Republican Crisis Politics: The Dangerous Precedent

The House GOP’s approach to funding for Israel sets a concerning precedent. Obviously, using the IRS as a bargaining chip in a matter of national security is a risky move. That action undermines the notion of nonpartisan support for crucial international issues. Rep. Jared Moskowitz rightly points out, that this strategy could be applied to future emergency funding requests. Thus the policy potentially results in cuts to vital programs when they are needed the most.

The Republican Dilemma

The House GOP’s strategy of pushing conservative legislation in the hopes of eventually settling for a watered-down version is indicative of a broader dilemma within the party. This approach often forces more moderate members to vote for extreme measures, risking a disconnect with the electorate and alienating potential supporters. Additionally, this strategy hinders the possibility of bipartisan cooperation, leading to legislative gridlock and public frustration.

A Way Forward

To address the challenges our nation faces, Republicans must shift their focus from Crisis Politics to principled governance. Prioritizing collaboration over confrontation is essential for effective governance and addressing pressing issues. The onus falls on Republican leadership to put the interests of the American people ahead of immediate political gains.


“Republican Crisis Politics” may yield short-term political victories. Long-term victories begin with pragmatic governance that places the nation’s interests first. By doing so, they can better serve the American people and uphold the principles of democracy.

By Politics-as-Usual

Roger is a retired Professor of language and literacy. Over the past 15 years since his retirement, Roger has kept busy with reading, writing, and creating landscape photographs. In this time of National crisis, as Fascist ideas and policies are being introduced to the American people and ignored by the Mainstream Press, he decided to stand up and be counted as a Progressive American with some ideas that should be shared with as many people who care to read and/or participate in discusssions of these issues. He doesn't ask anyone to agree with his point of view, but if entering the conversation he demands civility. No conspiracy theories, no wild accusations, no threats, no disrespect will be tolerated. Roger monitors all comments and email communication. That is the only rule for entering the conversation. One may persuade, argue for a different point of view, or toss out something that has not been discussed so long as the tone remains part of a civil discussion. Only then can we find common ground and meaningful democratic change.

One thought on “Republican Crisis Politics: A Flawed Governance Strategy”
  1. […] In those turbulent years, the lack of a strong central government rendered the nation ineffective in…. Significantly, the framers traded a strong central government rendering the states weaker partners. The framer’s idea of unity in the overall governing of the original 13 states won the day. The pressure from the southern states, however, secured some states’ rights as a compromise undermining Federal power. We are facing just that possibility in the politics of alternative facts that exist at this moment. […]

Leave a Reply