Mike Johnson, the latest House Speaker, is an ineffective and authoritarian House Speaker. A third-grade Christian education governs his life views and has no place in a Constitutionally structured government.

The Establishment Clause of the Constitution of the United States

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

The clause prohibits the establishment of a state religion and, by inference, supports free choice in the practice of religion. One may even choose to follow no Religion in the United States. MAGA Mike seems to not understand that fundamental point.

In the realm of American politics, House Speaker Mike Johnson stands out as a figure who raises serious concerns about his effectiveness as a leader and his penchant for authoritarian governance. Johnson’s controversial views and his rigid adherence to a particular brand of religious fundamentalism are not only out of touch with the evolving social landscape but also pose a danger to the principles of democracy.

Mike Johnson: Blaming Women’s Rights for Mass Shootings: An Alarming Perspective

One of the most alarming aspects of Mike Johnson’s political career is his propensity to blame societal issues on the expansion of women’s rights. He argues that feminism, abortion, and even “no-fault divorces” are responsible for mass shootings. A position that not only defies logic but also reveals a disturbing perspective on gender equality and personal freedom.

Johnson offers that granting women control over their bodies is an egregious sin. Furthermore, the ability to end a marriage without proving misconduct leads to mass violence is absurd. It’s important to recognize that these advancements were significant steps toward providing women with agency over their lives. For instance, the constitutional right to abortion, as articulated in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, was not merely about reproductive rights but also about empowering women to make critical decisions about their futures. Finally, American women had the freedom to decide whether they wanted to proceed with a pregnancy.

Mike Johnson: Disregard for Women’s Rights and Personal Freedom

Mike Johnson’s opposition to women’s reproductive rights is particularly concerning. His public support for a Louisiana law that would imprison and impose hard labor on anyone aiding a woman in obtaining an abortion is an affront to personal freedom and bodily autonomy. Such a stance disregards women’s rights. Equally important it also represents an attempt to impose his religious beliefs on the nation. This directly violates the Constitutional separation of church and state.

Furthermore, Johnson’s co-sponsorship of a bill to ban abortions after roughly six weeks of pregnancy, without exceptions, demonstrates a deep lack of empathy for women. By supporting such extreme measures, Johnson essentially compels women to adhere to his religious convictions. That is to say, he disregards the diversity of beliefs and perspectives in the United States.

Authoritarian Ideals Over Democracy: According to Mike Johnson

Johnson proudly declares that his policy views are solely based on his interpretation of the Bible. Deeply held personal faith is a value for many Americans. However, using religious doctrine as the sole basis for policymaking raises serious concerns about his commitment to democracy. His religious zeal shows a profound disrespect for the Constitutional protection of free religious choices.

An effective leader in a diverse and pluralistic society like the United States should prioritize inclusivity, fairness, and the protection of individual rights. By positioning his religious beliefs as the foundation for his policy decisions, Johnson showcases a troubling inclination towards authoritarian governance rather than respecting the secular and multifaceted nature of American society. This approach risks marginalizing and alienating those who do not share his specific religious convictions.

Mike Johnson: Misguided Opposition to “No-Fault Divorces”

Johnson’s criticism of “no-fault divorces” is another example of his alignment with religious extremists. Without a doubt, these zealots resist empowering women to make their own choices within marriages. Contrary to his beliefs, “no-fault divorces” were instrumental in leveling the legal playing field for women in marital disputes. Basically, Before these reforms, women often found themselves at a disadvantage in divorce proceedings. Through no fault of their own, they were frequently faced with male attorneys and judges who might hold biased views. The introduction of “no-fault divorces” aimed to create a more equitable environment in the legal system.

Additionally, research has shown that “no-fault divorce” laws resulted in a 30% decrease in domestic violence, as it not only made it easier for abused individuals to escape harmful marriages but also discouraged potential abusers by making them aware that their partners had the option to leave. These laws also contributed to reducing the rates of suicide among women.


Mike Johnson’s tenure as House Speaker raises profound questions about his ability to effectively lead and govern a diverse and dynamic nation. His regressive views on women’s rights, his reliance on religious doctrine to shape policy, and his opposition to policies that empower women and protect personal freedoms stand in stark contrast to the principles of democracy and progress. As a nation, it is essential that we critically assess the values and actions of our leaders to ensure they uphold the principles upon which the United States was founded, safeguarding the rights and freedoms of all its citizens.

By Politics-as-Usual

Roger is a retired Professor of language and literacy. Over the past 15 years since his retirement, Roger has kept busy with reading, writing, and creating landscape photographs. In this time of National crisis, as Fascist ideas and policies are being introduced to the American people and ignored by the Mainstream Press, he decided to stand up and be counted as a Progressive American with some ideas that should be shared with as many people who care to read and/or participate in discusssions of these issues. He doesn't ask anyone to agree with his point of view, but if entering the conversation he demands civility. No conspiracy theories, no wild accusations, no threats, no disrespect will be tolerated. Roger monitors all comments and email communication. That is the only rule for entering the conversation. One may persuade, argue for a different point of view, or toss out something that has not been discussed so long as the tone remains part of a civil discussion. Only then can we find common ground and meaningful democratic change.

3 thoughts on “Mike Johnson: An Ineffective – Authoritarian House Speaker”

Leave a Reply