...

Introduction

Educational Standards

Our fixation with educational standards and achievement testing has been a contentious issue for decades. One can trace the origins of this flawed approach to teaching and learning to the Reagan Administration and the Education Department publication, A Nation at Risk.

While proponents argue that standardized tests ensure educational quality and accountability, a closer examination reveals a myriad of concerning issues. This piece delves into various problems associated with the current system, from its lack of cultural inclusivity and regional considerations to its detrimental effects on teaching methods, student well-being, and teacher professionalism. Through specific examples and credible citations, we shed light on the flaws that have persisted in the pursuit of standardized education.

Our Fixation on Educational Standards: A Brief look at A Nation At Risk and the Long-Term Consequences of this flawed Study

“A Nation at Risk” was a seminal publication released in 1983 by the National Commission on Excellence in Education, which aimed to address concerns about the state of American education. The stimulus behind the study was the growing perception that the quality of education in the United States was declining, and the nation’s future competitiveness was at risk due to the inadequacies of its education system.

While the intention behind “A Nation at Risk” was to highlight genuine concerns about the education system, it must be acknowledged that the study was influenced by a sense of crisis and urgency, which might have led to an exaggerated portrayal of the situation. The report used alarmist language and dramatic metaphors, such as describing the state of education as a “rising tide of mediocrity,” which potentially instilled fear and panic among the public and policymakers.

One of the principal authors of A Nation at Risk, Diane Ravitch, later turned to the best practice approach rather than follow the bombast of the report she helped author.

Critique of the Consequences: Our Fixation on Educational Standards:

In the aftermath of “A Nation at Risk,” there was a noticeable shift towards standardized testing and accountability measures. While assessment is crucial for evaluating student progress and teacher effectiveness, an overemphasis on standardized testing may have led to a narrowed curriculum and a culture of “teaching to the test,” neglecting other important aspects of education, such as critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving.

Neglect of Socioeconomic Factors

The report did not adequately address the significant impact of socioeconomic factors on educational outcomes. By largely overlooking the influence of poverty, inequality, and lack of resources on student performance, the focus on educational reform became disproportionately centered on schools and teachers, rather than addressing systemic issues.

Erosion of Teacher Autonomy

The call for increased accountability led to stricter regulations and a top-down approach to education reform. This eroded the autonomy of teachers and schools, limiting their ability to adapt teaching methods to suit their students’ unique needs and hindering innovation in the classroom.

Uneven Policy Implementation

The consequences of “A Nation at Risk” varied across states and districts. While some regions initiated valuable reforms and improvements, others pursued hasty and poorly-designed changes that may have hindered progress rather than promoted it. This patchwork of policy implementations resulted in an inconsistent impact on the overall education system.

Neglect of Non-Academic Factors

The report primarily focused on academic standards and test scores, overlooking the importance of non-academic aspects of education, such as physical education, arts, and extracurricular activities, which are vital for the holistic development of students.

A Nation at Risk played a significant role in raising awareness about the state of American education in the 1980s. However, its alarmist tone, narrow focus on standardized testing, neglect of socioeconomic factors, erosion of teacher autonomy, uneven policy implementation, and disregard for non-academic aspects of education have resulted in both positive and negative consequences over the years. While the report spurred some improvements, it also contributed to problematic approaches to education reform that have been subject to ongoing debate and scrutiny. It serves as a reminder that education policies and reforms should be comprehensive, equitable, and based on a deep understanding of the complexities of the education system. Let’s Explore

Absence of National Culture in Educational Standards Development

The development of national educational standards has been an ongoing challenge due to the absence of a cohesive national culture. The United States is a diverse country comprising various ethnicities, cultures, and traditions. Attempting to impose a uniform set of standards fails to recognize and appreciate the unique attributes of different communities. Not even Common Core provided a strong national structure to what must otherwise be a flexible, structured balanced curriculum absent in the one-size-fits-all all design.

For instance, when designing a history curriculum that emphasizes only European history and downplays the contributions of African American or Native American figures, it perpetuates a Eurocentric bias. This approach not only undermines the cultural identity of non-European students but also reinforces a narrow understanding of history, disregarding the richness of diverse perspectives.

Our Fixation on Educational Standards: Favors White, Middle-Class Students

The prevailing educational standards tend to center on a schema that caters to white, middle-class students, leading to systemic inequality in education. These standards may reflect the experiences and cultural references familiar to this demographic but alienate students from lower-income families and underrepresented communities.

Consider the language used in standardized tests; it often assumes a level of familiarity with certain vocabulary and concepts more prevalent in middle-class environments. As a result, students from disadvantaged backgrounds may encounter language barriers, affecting their ability to fully comprehend and answer test questions accurately.

Our Fixation on Educational Standards: Ignoring Regional and Local Norms

Standardized testing’s concentration on generic, one-size-fits-all questions ignores the diverse regional and local norms that exist across the country. Every region has unique characteristics, histories, and challenges that shape the way students learn and engage with their education.

For example, a standardized math question involving the measurement of agricultural land may resonate with students from rural areas but could be perplexing for their urban counterparts, who lack the same exposure to farm-related concepts.

Achievement Testing Correlates best with IQ Testing, Not Academic Achievement

Numerous studies have shown a strong correlation between standardized achievement tests and IQ testing. This indicates that these tests may inadvertently measure a student’s alignment with white, middle-class generic norms, rather than their true academic abilities.

To illustrate, a verbal reasoning question may assess a student’s ability to decipher analogies or identify patterns, skills that align closely with cognitive abilities emphasized in IQ tests. Consequently, the test may not accurately gauge a student’s knowledge or aptitude in a specific subject area.

Our Fixation on Educational Standards: Encouraging Memorization Over Critical Thinking

The pressure on teachers to prepare students for standardized tests can result in a focus on rote memorization of trivial facts rather than fostering critical thinking skills. This “teaching to the test” approach stifles creativity and genuine comprehension, hindering students’ long-term academic growth and problem-solving abilities.

As an example, in preparation for standardized English exams, teachers may allocate significant class time to drilling students on grammar rules or vocabulary lists, rather than encouraging them to engage in thoughtful analysis and interpretation of literary works.

Stressful Impact on Students and Their Relationship to Education

The high-stakes nature of standardized testing places an immense burden on students, significantly impacting their mental well-being and overall attitude toward learning. The emphasis on test scores can create a fear of failure, leading to heightened anxiety and reduced motivation to pursue education.

For instance, a student may avoid challenging subjects or shy away from taking risks in their academic pursuits, fearing that poor test performance might define their entire educational journey.

Our Fixation on Educational Standards: Misinterpretation of Testing Scores by Nearly All Stakeholders

Testing scores are often misunderstood and misused by various stakeholders, including politicians, teachers, parents, and school administrators. The reliance on these scores to evaluate a student’s abilities or a teacher’s performance oversimplifies the complexities of education.

For example, claiming that a third-grade student is reading at a sixth-grade level based solely on test scores overlooks other crucial aspects of their development and potential, such as emotional intelligence or creative abilities.

Detracting from the Professionalism of University-Trained Teachers

Using standardized testing as the primary measure of teacher performance detracts from the professionalism and expertise of university-trained educators. This approach diminishes the significance of advanced pedagogical knowledge and experience in favor of test preparation skills.

Teachers may find themselves pressured to focus solely on test-specific strategies to boost scores, rather than implementing comprehensive and innovative teaching methods that cater to the diverse needs of their students.

Our Fixation on Educational Standards: Disregard Individual Student Needs

The universal application of standards assumes that all students, regardless of their backgrounds, interests, and talents, should conform to a generalized mold. This neglects the importance of tailoring education to meet the unique needs of each student.

For example, visual learners may struggle with a heavily text-based standardized test, even if they possess a deep understanding of the subject matter. Failing to account for such individual differences can lead to an inaccurate assessment of a student’s true academic potential.

Conclusion

The national obsession with educational standards and achievement testing is far from ideal. The issues highlighted in this piece demonstrate the urgent need for comprehensive reform. A more inclusive, culturally sensitive, and contextually relevant approach to education is essential to ensure that every student can thrive and reach their full potential.

By acknowledging the diverse cultural backgrounds and regional nuances in education, embracing critical thinking over memorization, reducing testing-related stress, and interpreting testing data more thoughtfully, we can create an education system that truly values and nurtures the unique qualities of every student. Additionally, refraining from overreliance on standardized testing for teacher evaluations will help preserve the professionalism and autonomy of educators while fostering a learning environment that celebrates individuality and encourages academic excellence. Only through a collective effort can we pave the way for a more equitable and enriching educational experience for all.

By Politics-as-Usual

Roger is a retired Professor of language and literacy. Over the past 15 years since his retirement, Roger has kept busy with reading, writing, and creating landscape photographs. In this time of National crisis, as Fascist ideas and policies are being introduced to the American people and ignored by the Mainstream Press, he decided to stand up and be counted as a Progressive American with some ideas that should be shared with as many people who care to read and/or participate in discusssions of these issues. He doesn't ask anyone to agree with his point of view, but if entering the conversation he demands civility. No conspiracy theories, no wild accusations, no threats, no disrespect will be tolerated. Roger monitors all comments and email communication. That is the only rule for entering the conversation. One may persuade, argue for a different point of view, or toss out something that has not been discussed so long as the tone remains part of a civil discussion. Only then can we find common ground and meaningful democratic change.

One thought on “Our Fixation on Educational Standards and Achievement Testing”
  1. […] Homeschooling stands as a beacon for families seeking an escape from underperforming public schools. The idea behind the movement is to enable them to craft an educational experience that mirrors their values. Of course, the question of “underperforming” is one with a historical component that is overlooked. Here I wish to add a brief history lesson. When Ronald Reagan became President of the United States,… […]

Leave a Reply