Just Say Nothing


The "Just Say Nothing" Strategy

The “Just Say Nothing” strategy appears to be the Democratic Party’s response to the rich fodder of former President Donald J. Trump’s ever-deepening legal woes. In this brief essay, I discuss the potential of such a powerful evidence-based campaign strategy that is exactly the opposite of the current strategy. Let’s explore…

In the ever-changing landscape of American politics, the Democrats’ current “Just Say Nothing” strategy concerning former President Donald J. Trump’s legal problems has sparked intriguing debates and discussions. This essay aims to delve deeper into the motivations behind the Democrats’ decision and assess its potential implications on their political fortunes. Additionally, it explores the role of the corporate press and media bias in shaping public perception and how this strategy may influence voter opinions.

Understanding The “Just Say Nothing” Strategy

The “Just Say Nothing” strategy is a tactical maneuver by the Democrats to avoid being embroiled in discussions and debates concerning Donald Trump’s legal issues. By staying silent on the matter, they aim to pivot the focus of their campaigns toward pressing national issues and their policy vision for the future.

The “Just Say Nothing” Strategy: Fear of Backlash and Sympathy Vote

One significant motivation for the Democrats’ adoption of the “Just Say Nothing” approach is the fear of a potential backlash from engaging in discussions about Trump’s legal woes. Publicly highlighting his legal problems might be seen as an attempt to capitalize on his misfortunes for political gain. Such a perception could energize Trump’s base and trigger a sympathy vote for him in 2024, as some voters might rally behind him, viewing him as a victim of unfair attacks.

Capitalizing on Trump’s Legal Issues

Despite the Democrats’ cautious approach, some argue that failing to address Trump’s legal problems could be a missed opportunity to capitalize on the divisive and possibly criminal behavior of the former President. By refraining from robustly condemning such actions, the Democrats may appear weak and unwilling to take a strong stance against alleged misconduct. This may leave some voters dissatisfied, looking for a more assertive approach from the party.

The “Just Say Nothing” Strategy: The Role of Corporate Press and Bias

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion, and the corporate press, despite claiming to be unbiased, can be subject to sensationalism and favoring scandalous stories. Examples from the past four decades indicate instances where media outlets have blown stories out of proportion, relied on rumors and innuendos, and presented biased coverage.

For instance, during the 2016 election, media coverage often focused on sensational aspects of both Trump and Hillary Clinton’s campaigns, overshadowing policy discussions. Similarly, controversies marked coverage of Trump’s presidency, and at times, stories were presented in a manner that undermined public trust in media objectivity.

Evaluating the Implications

The Democrats’ “Just Say Nothing” strategy carries both potential advantages and disadvantages. By avoiding Trump’s legal issues, they may successfully redirect attention toward their own policy agenda and avoid alienating moderate voters who prefer discussions on pressing national matters. However, this strategy may also be perceived negatively by voters seeking strong leadership and a willingness to confront misconduct allegations, leading to the potential erosion of trust among certain segments of the electorate.

Moreover, the risk of media sensationalism and biased reporting remains a concern. If the media chooses to focus solely on Trump’s legal issues without providing a balanced perspective, it could further exacerbate divisions and polarize public opinion. This could impact how voters perceive the Democrats’ strategy and the overall narrative surrounding Trump’s legal woes.

The “Just Say Nothing” Strategy: Message Clarity and Consistency

Central to the “Just Say Nothing” strategy is the clarity and consistency of the campaign’s messaging. The Democratic candidate, whether running for the presidency or any other office, must articulate the reasons for not engaging extensively in discussions about Trump’s legal woes in a straightforward manner. This includes emphasizing the importance of focusing on pressing national issues and their policy agenda to bring about positive change for the American people.

Consistency in the candidate’s message is crucial to prevent misunderstandings and accusations of evasion. Whether speaking at rallies, debates, interviews, or through social media, the candidate and their campaign team must ensure that the message remains consistent and aligned with the core principles of the strategy.

Highlighting Policy Priorities

To effectively shift the focus away from Trump’s legal problems, the Democratic candidate must emphasize their policy priorities and present a compelling vision for the future. The campaign should utilize various communication channels, such as policy papers, fact sheets, and town hall events, to clearly outline its plans to address critical issues, including healthcare, education, climate change, and economic growth.

By demonstrating a strong policy agenda, the campaign can engage voters on substantive matters, showing that they are focused on solving real-world challenges rather than engaging in partisan distractions.

The “Just Say Nothing” Strategy: Addressing Allegations of Weakness

Critics may argue that the “Just Say Nothing” strategy portrays the Democrats as weak or afraid to confront allegations of criminal behavior by the former President. To counter these allegations, the candidate should maintain a principled stance on the importance of upholding the rule of law and supporting ongoing investigations into any potential misconduct, regardless of political affiliations.

The campaign can underscore the distinction between acknowledging the legal process and avoiding politicization of the matter. By reiterating their commitment to justice and accountability while still prioritizing their policy agenda, the candidates can present themselves as principled and strong leaders.

Media Engagement and Surrogate Voices

Navigating media coverage is critical to the success of the strategy. The Democratic candidate and their team must actively engage with media outlets to promote their policy proposals and policy-focused messaging. This may include participating in interviews, press conferences, and timely responses to relevant news stories.

To address concerns about media bias and sensationalism, the campaign should also utilize influential surrogates from diverse backgrounds to reinforce the rationale behind the “Just Say Nothing” strategy. Surrogates can speak on behalf of the candidate, presenting a united front and avoiding misinterpretations of the campaign’s intentions.

The “Just Say Nothing” Strategy: Flexibility and Voter Feedback

As the campaign progresses, the Democratic candidate’s team should remain flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances. Regularly conducting polls and gathering voter feedback will help gauge the effectiveness of the strategy and identify potential areas for improvement.

If voter feedback indicates that the strategy is not resonating as intended or if there are concerns about the approach, the campaign should be prepared to adjust its messaging and communications tactics accordingly. Flexibility is essential to respond to evolving public sentiments and ensure the campaign’s message effectively addresses voter concerns.


The Democrats’ “Just Say Nothing” strategy is a nuanced approach that demands careful execution and adaptability. By emphasizing policy priorities, addressing allegations of weakness, engaging with media outlets, and utilizing influential surrogates, the Democratic candidate can effectively implement this strategy.

Through clear and consistent messaging, the candidate can avoid being drawn into divisive debates about Trump’s legal problems while demonstrating a commitment to justice and accountability. By staying focused on policy issues, the campaign positions itself as a viable option for voters seeking substantive solutions and a better future for the nation. Flexibility and responsiveness to voter feedback are essential in shaping the campaign’s success and effectively appealing to a broad range of voters in the 2024 election and beyond.

By Politics-as-Usual

Roger is a retired Professor of language and literacy. Over the past 15 years since his retirement, Roger has kept busy with reading, writing, and creating landscape photographs. In this time of National crisis, as Fascist ideas and policies are being introduced to the American people and ignored by the Mainstream Press, he decided to stand up and be counted as a Progressive American with some ideas that should be shared with as many people who care to read and/or participate in discusssions of these issues. He doesn't ask anyone to agree with his point of view, but if entering the conversation he demands civility. No conspiracy theories, no wild accusations, no threats, no disrespect will be tolerated. Roger monitors all comments and email communication. That is the only rule for entering the conversation. One may persuade, argue for a different point of view, or toss out something that has not been discussed so long as the tone remains part of a civil discussion. Only then can we find common ground and meaningful democratic change.

Leave a Reply