Introduction to Religious Fanaticism

The Path of Religious Fanaticism

This post explores the path of religious fanaticism when it focuses on issues of personal choice with an emphasis on their morality imposed on the wider secular society. After the breakdown of law and the rise of organized crime when religious zealots created the prohibition of alcohol and the rise of organized crime, or the same imposition with the war on drugs in the United States, and the resulting increase in crime as a result.

One might think that the imposition of a particular brand of morality on the broader population that is against such an imposition, we might have learned our lesson. But, no, we keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. An obsessive strategy for a diverse population. Let’s take a closer look at the disruption after a year after the overturning of Roe by the Supreme Court.

The recent upheaval in American politics surrounding the abortion debate has brought the actions of the evangelical Christian right wing into the spotlight. As they celebrate legal victories in overturning Roe v. Wade and successfully imposing stringent restrictions on abortion, concerns are mounting about the erosion of social justice in America. This essay aims to delve deeper into the dangerous path taken by religious fanatics, who are unyieldingly determined to control women’s bodies and silence their voices, even in cases of violent rape, while advocating for the alarming provision of parental rights to rapists.

Curtailing Reproductive Rights and the Implications of Interstate Commerce:

The religious right’s relentless pursuit of abortion restrictions is manifesting in laws that severely curtail reproductive rights in many conservative states. These laws often impose near-total bans on abortion, pushing women to seek medical care across state lines. However, rather than acknowledging the rights of women to make decisions about their own bodies and healthcare, these fanatics are seeking to punish those who travel for abortions. Such actions not only infringe upon individual rights but also raise significant concerns about the potential misuse of power at the state level.

In the pursuit of their ideological goals, religious fanatics are effectively challenging the principles of interstate commerce. The Constitution explicitly grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, but these states seem eager to undermine this fundamental aspect of federal governance. By unilaterally imposing restrictions on abortion and actively penalizing women who exercise their rights across state borders, they risk creating a fragmented, inconsistent, and divisive landscape that threatens the unity of the nation.

Religious Fanaticism: Denying Justice to Victims of Violent Rape

Among the most distressing consequences of the religious right’s anti-abortion stance is their treatment of victims of violent rape. While the trauma of sexual assault is already devastating, forcing victims to carry pregnancies resulting from such heinous acts only serves to further victimize them. Women who have already endured unimaginable pain are now faced with the harrowing decision of whether to raise a child conceived through violence or seek a potentially dangerous and illegal abortion.

The moral reprehensibility of such an approach cannot be overstated. It demonstrates a lack of compassion and empathy for survivors, as these religious fanatics prioritize their ideological agenda over the well-being of the individuals directly affected by these policies. By denying women the right to choose, they perpetuate the harmful notion that victims of sexual assault must bear the lifelong consequences of their attackers’ actions.

Religious Fanaticism: Shifting Responsibility to Women

The religious right’s approach to abortion reveals a troubling gender disparity in the burden of responsibility. By championing policies that force women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, regardless of their circumstances, they display a callous disregard for the challenges and hardships these women may face. Whether it be the financial strain of raising a child alone or the emotional toll of becoming a parent against one’s will, these fanatics ignore the complexities of real-life situations and oversimplify the issue to fit their rigid ideological framework.

This attitude also reflects a concerning lack of concern for the well-being of the children involved. Raising a child in an environment where they are not wanted or cannot be adequately cared for may lead to adverse outcomes for both the child and society at large. By refusing to address the systemic issues that lead to unwanted pregnancies and advocating for comprehensive support systems, they exacerbate the very problems they claim to be solving.

Granting Parental Rights to Violent Rapists: Religious Fanaticism

One of the most shocking and morally indefensible aspects of the religious right’s agenda is their support for granting parental rights to violent rapists. By allowing attackers to have a say in the upbringing and welfare of the child conceived through their heinous actions, they perpetuate a cycle of victimization and trauma. Granting rapists any level of control over their victims’ lives, especially in the context of parenthood, not only defies logic but also goes against the principles of justice and human rights.


The crackpot direction that the religious fanatics are taking the nation regarding abortion and reproductive rights is alarming and deeply concerning. By seeking to illegally regulate interstate commerce, punish women seeking abortions, and deny justice to victims of violent rape, they are sowing division and jeopardizing the principles of social justice and individual autonomy.

It is crucial for society to stand united against these regressive measures and advocate for the protection of women’s reproductive rights, bodily autonomy, and access to comprehensive healthcare. The pursuit of true social justice requires empathy, inclusivity, and respect for individual rights. Only by upholding these values can we hope to build a just and equitable society that respects the diverse beliefs and circumstances of its citizens. Abandoning the crackpot direction of religious fanaticism is not just necessary for America but for the well-being of society worldwide.

By Politics-as-Usual

Roger is a retired Professor of language and literacy. Over the past 15 years since his retirement, Roger has kept busy with reading, writing, and creating landscape photographs. In this time of National crisis, as Fascist ideas and policies are being introduced to the American people and ignored by the Mainstream Press, he decided to stand up and be counted as a Progressive American with some ideas that should be shared with as many people who care to read and/or participate in discusssions of these issues. He doesn't ask anyone to agree with his point of view, but if entering the conversation he demands civility. No conspiracy theories, no wild accusations, no threats, no disrespect will be tolerated. Roger monitors all comments and email communication. That is the only rule for entering the conversation. One may persuade, argue for a different point of view, or toss out something that has not been discussed so long as the tone remains part of a civil discussion. Only then can we find common ground and meaningful democratic change.

5 thoughts on “The Path of Religious Fanaticism: Anti-Abortion Post Roe”
  1. […] GOP’s Anti-Abortion Agenda takes a brief look at recent events as fallout from the Supreme Cou…. In the wake of Dobbs, Republican-controlled states passed several draconian anti-abortion legislation. Many of these created felony murder charges that apply to both the woman and any physician who performs an abortion. Is this a step into Gilead and the utter subjugation of women in the United States? […]

  2. […] Restoring women’s rights to follow medical professional advice that goes far beyond reproducti… It is scandalous that a corrupt Supreme Court can so disgracefully ignore over 50 years of precedence to rewrite the future of a private relationship one has with one’s doctors in favor of relying on old white men who gerrymander their place in state legislatures to make laws denying women of a right to make private health decisions. […]

  3. […] In a distressing turn of events, Texas Republicans, spearheaded by Attorney General Ken Paxton, have… This piece delves into the deeply troubling actions that endanger women’s health. It also shakes the foundations of established constitutional principles, particularly those laid out by Roe v. Wade. This action demonstrates the fallout from SCOTUS overturning Roe more than a year ago. […]

  4. […] GOP Dobbs-Driven Strategy. Consequences of Roe v. Wade overturned by SCOTUS using a state’s ri… Did the Radical majority think there would be no consequential backlash to effectively making Roe absolute? Perhaps the result is precisely what they intended. Find a reason to weaken the Federal Government opening the door to Oligarchs and Fascists to take over our nation. […]

Leave a Reply