Banned Books


The Resurgence of Book Banning

The Resurgence of Book Banning is a modern-day expression of anti-intellectualism and discrimination emanating from the core of the MAGA Republican Party. It is a far cry from being a new phenomenon. On the contrary, it is driven by a core fear of being replaced by the other (Jews, Muslims, Immigrants, Black, and Brown people). It is a common theme evolving from a primitive tribal mentality that provided a sense of protection and survival of the familial group, perhaps the extension of a nuclear family.

In societies around the world, the act of banning and burning books has been employed as a political tool to suppress knowledge, control narratives, and advance discriminatory ideologies. Anti-intellectual movements have historically sought to stifle intellectual curiosity, undermine critical thinking, and reinforce oppressive beliefs. This essay explores the long-standing trend of book banning as a form of discrimination, particularly when driven by religious and discriminatory ideologies. By examining the current movement to ban books in the United States, we can shed light on the implications and risks associated with this resurgent wave of anti-intellectualism.

Historical Context of The Resurgence of Book Banning: The Suppression of Knowledge

Throughout history, societies have engaged in book burning as a means of maintaining power and control over information. From ancient civilizations to modern regimes, book burning has been used to silence dissent, suppress alternative viewpoints, and maintain social hierarchies. In Qin Dynasty China, books challenging the ruling regime’s ideology were systematically destroyed. The Roman Catholic Church’s Index Librorum Prohibitorum (Index of Forbidden Books) in the Renaissance era restricted access to works considered heretical or subversive. The Nazi regime infamously burned books that contradicted their ideologies, aiming to shape public opinion and maintain control. These historical instances reveal a pattern of book banning as a tool of oppression and discrimination.

Anti-Intellectualism and Discrimination in The Resurgence of Book Banning: Foundations of Book Banning

At the core of anti-intellectualism lies a distrust of intellectual pursuits, an aversion to critical thinking, and a rejection of evidence-based knowledge. Anti-intellectual movements often arise in societies where populist sentiments gain traction, questioning the authority and expertise of intellectuals. When intertwined with discriminatory beliefs, anti-intellectualism becomes a powerful force that seeks to suppress ideas and perspectives that challenge established norms or power structures. By banning books, proponents of anti-intellectualism aim to limit access to information that may challenge their worldview, perpetuating discriminatory ideologies and reinforcing social inequalities.

The United States: A Contemporary Case Study of The Resurgence of Book Banning

In the United States, there has been a notable resurgence of book-banning movements in recent years. These efforts have been driven by a variety of motivations, including moral concerns, political ideologies, and religious beliefs. Some bans have targeted books dealing with LGBTQ+ themes, racial justice, or questioning traditional gender roles. Religious and conservative groups have sought to remove texts they perceive as conflicting with their religious doctrines or promoting what they consider immoral values. These book-banning initiatives reflect the enduring connection between anti-intellectualism and discrimination, as certain ideas are deemed threatening or incompatible with prevailing beliefs.

The Resurgence of Book Banning and Its Implications for Intellectual Freedom and Democracy

Book banning poses significant threats to intellectual freedom and the functioning of a democratic society. Intellectual freedom allows individuals to explore a wide range of ideas, engage in critical thinking, and foster an informed citizenry. When books are banned, access to information becomes restricted, hindering the development of well-rounded perspectives and stifling intellectual growth. The suppression of ideas and diverse viewpoints undermines the principles of democracy by limiting public discourse, narrowing the range of voices heard, and impeding progress and social change.

Resistance and Countermeasures to The Resurgence of Book Banning

To safeguard intellectual freedom, it is essential to resist and counteract book-banning initiatives. Advocacy for intellectual freedom should be a collective effort, engaging individuals, organizations, and communities. Educators play a vital role in promoting critical thinking skills and fostering an appreciation for intellectual diversity in classrooms. Libraries and librarians should continue to champion the principles of intellectual freedom by providing access to a wide range of books, promoting open dialogue, and resisting censorship attempts. Legal challenges can be pursued by civil liberties organizations and individuals to protect the right to access information and challenge unconstitutional bans.

Community engagement is key in fostering a culture that values intellectual diversity and inclusivity. Public campaigns, grassroots movements, and public forums can raise awareness about the dangers of book banning and its implications for intellectual freedom and democracy. By emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives, promoting respectful dialogue, and encouraging empathy, communities can resist the influence of anti-intellectualism and discriminatory beliefs.

In Summary

The resurgence of book banning in the United States represents a contemporary manifestation of the long-standing trend of anti-intellectualism and discrimination. Understanding the historical context and implications for intellectual freedom and democracy allows us to recognize the urgency of addressing this issue. By actively resisting book banning, advocating for intellectual freedom, and embracing diverse perspectives, we can protect the pursuit of knowledge, nurture critical thinking, and create a society that values inclusivity, tolerance, and the power of ideas. Only through these collective efforts can we safeguard intellectual freedom and preserve the foundations of a democratic society.

Post Script

The Resurgence of Book Banning

Only 80 years ago, Nazis were burning books in the streets of Germany. Fascists use book burning and book banning as a means of controlling what people think. Allowing only thoughts that conform to the will of the Party, this anti-intellectual practice is a vicious barbaric form of censorship intended to force compliant thought, or at the very least, unvoiced resistance. What has been dubbed The Greatest Generation fought WWII on two fronts to rid the world of fascist dictatorships once and for all. Yet in the United States, the current Republican Party is fostering such censorship with the same intentions in mind as Adolph Hitler had in Germany, total control of the people through fear and violence.

If you are unsure of the titles of the books these extremists are banning, just walk into a Barnes & Noble bookstore and ask to see their Banned Books table. You will be surprised.

By Politics-as-Usual

Roger is a retired Professor of language and literacy. Over the past 15 years since his retirement, Roger has kept busy with reading, writing, and creating landscape photographs. In this time of National crisis, as Fascist ideas and policies are being introduced to the American people and ignored by the Mainstream Press, he decided to stand up and be counted as a Progressive American with some ideas that should be shared with as many people who care to read and/or participate in discusssions of these issues. He doesn't ask anyone to agree with his point of view, but if entering the conversation he demands civility. No conspiracy theories, no wild accusations, no threats, no disrespect will be tolerated. Roger monitors all comments and email communication. That is the only rule for entering the conversation. One may persuade, argue for a different point of view, or toss out something that has not been discussed so long as the tone remains part of a civil discussion. Only then can we find common ground and meaningful democratic change.

One thought on “The Resurgence of Book Banning: Anti-Intellectualism”
  1. […] It’s a paradox that literature itself would relish: the more lawmakers decree certain books as off-limits, the more they inadvertently cast these books as protagonists in a compelling narrative of rebellion. Imagine a group of well-intentioned policymakers huddled around their decision-making table, discussing which books should earn the dubious distinction of being stamped with the forbidden mark. Little do they know; they’re essentially launching these books on an unexpected adventure – one that leads straight into the labyrinthine corridors of human curiosity. […]

Leave a Reply